Positions

Where I stand on the questions that matter

Four questions. Four positions. Each one backed by a paper or essay, not just an opinion.

  1. Who should govern AI memory?

    AI memory is a sovereignty issue, not a privacy one. Nations need portability, transparency, and the option of running their own. Treat it like infrastructure, because it is.

  2. Where does AI alignment hit a hard wall?

    Alignment isn't infinitely solvable. There are formal proofs that some kinds of safe behaviour can never be guaranteed. Real frameworks should respect those limits, not pretend they don't exist.

  3. How does AI end up running the show without anyone voting for it?

    Quietly. Decisions get routed through AI faster than accountability can keep up. Call this what it is — shadow sovereignty — and you can start governing it.

  4. What should leaders actually pay attention to right now?

    Not the dashboard. Not the latest agent demo. The decision itself — its options, its blind spots, who else is at the table. Build tools that serve that, not the other way around.